Toward a new conception of Euro-Optimism: White Energetics, Euro-Positivity, White Centralism, and Neocaucasianism

 

White positivity is simply described as the general and loose movement of white human beings, in the forms of generality, individuality, and in all forms of multiplicity and singularity, to identify with one another, via whiteness as a form of identity and relation. White positivity or white core-self-centrality is a field, a loose study, an occupation of the mind and the spirit, an occupation of language and relation. It is not something defined in and of itself. It is not pre-determined. It is defined by its actions, by its general aim – that aim being a delineation of positive identity. A delineation of pro-active, optimistic identification and self-knowledge of “white” human beings. What that is is beyond the purview of this particular entry. But this entry does seek to define a new aim for human beings, a new aim for societies and cultures.

The word “optimism” means that Euro-Energetics seeks not to harm or interfere with “other” races. White centralism is by necessity neutral toward all other races. It is not interested in discussions of other races, besides perhaps those instances where “other” entities seek to cease the centrality of white identity, of which there are many examples in today’s confused but largely well-intentioned progressive dominated society. Euro-optimism is primarily a movement of positivity – of defining, describing, drawing to attention, expanding upon, and articulating a positive and optimistic centrality that is not of relation to other races, but simply the white race. It is the act of making space for these feelings, words, ideas, concepts, and activities.

In this sense, it is a response to the movement of “other” races, minorities, and so on, to act in their own self-interests both privately and publicly. For we feel that “white” members of the human race deserve, both privately and publicly, to act in their own self-interests as a collective. But they must be able to do so without the everlasting “taint” of historic activities and prejudices, without the “mark” of white supremacist on their clothing and in their social reality. Hence the delineation of a positive identification, and an optimistic centrality from which they can refer.

Whenever you are seeking to craft a new positive and properly white identity, you are working in the interests of white energetics. You are changing the discussion, and moving us away from the activities of what has been tagged and removed from the possibility of acceptance through that tag of “white supremacy” or simply “whiteness.” You are helping to create a new safe space for white people, as a general term, to self-identify, to identify with one another, and to identify with the positive works of their race and their culture, to discuss the problems of their race and culture without ridicule. We compare this movement to the reaction that is the men’s rights movement, in that it is a “smiling” or happy movement, that is not necessarily interested in the more angry or hateful side of the problem. However, I would like to say that white energetics does not shy away from difficult subjects, nor from the necessary actions and attitudes needed to break away from lowly mentalities which seek to make members of this race “forget” their positive side, in much the same way racist attitudes might make members of minority groups “forget” their possibilities as human beings.

We need this word, this conceptual idea to gather around. We need a label that can guide us out of the darkness, something to attribute ourselves to. We need a positive identity based in optimism, but also centrality, in that we gather around a core, around positive central self-identifications. This not, however, a phallic matter. It can be conceived of as a scraggly passage with much possibility, and creativity. We are not against wildness of imagination.

So, with this post I hope to establish the ongoing project of white energetics, or perhaps better termed Euro-optimism, and for this post to be seen not as telling you what Euro-optimism, white energetics, Euro-positivity, white centralism, or neo-caucasionism are. It is merely to set this project in stone, to give it a name, to give it a drive or a movement, and to say “it has begun, even if it is a small, shaky premise… something new has been delivered to us here, and we now have a central core from which to consider and ponder our reality and our situation.”

We are not white supremacists. We are white optimists. We are Euro-Positivists. We believe in the positive value of what is proper to whiteness. We believe in the positive existence of white identity. The last thing I must say in this post is that we are not to respond to petty or trivial criticisms such as “what is white! that means nothing!” We believe that this is self-evident, and that the delineation of this word, “white,” can be done in future posts. Suffice to say, we are uninterested in the usual delineations and criticisms… we are not interested in tearing down white identity. Euro-Optimism runs directly counter to those aims, or is neutral to them and simply “uninterested” in them.

Unlike white supremacy, or nationalist movements, we are not interested in sitting around hating other races. We are not given toward wasting our energy on such things, or in bolstering ourselves. We are interested in what is CENTRAL to our own identities. So why would we waste time responding to criticisms of whiteness, or critiquing the positive or negative qualities of other races? This is for us, whoever that might be.

Is Euro-positivity open to other races? Yes, much in the same way that feminism is open to men, or black culture studies are open to white men. We are not seeking to form a dogma, or form a circle-jerk, or form a hug box that has the dogmatic and incessant goal of making white men dominant totalitarian leaders and slave drivers in control of all reality and all beings. We are interested in the cultural and social experience of positive white identity, of the strong core value of European existence. This can be interpreted in some way as a response to the current modern and progressive ideology which does not allow for “white privileged” members of society to identify with themselves, or with their own culture, in a healthy and respectful way. IT does not allow white people to experience “self-respect” with regard to their own race. It does not allow them to speak positively about European culture without shame. And this is what we seek to dismantle.

This is white QUA white. European QUA European. Be that German, French, Italian, Spanish, or whatever you think it may be. What this means is that Euro-Optimism happens, exists, and is without any reference to the “other.” In this sense it is very much a “phallic” discourse in some ways. It is not averse to centrality or “core” identity. This is the self-esteem of the concept. So to reiterate: White Energetics, or Euro-Optimism, exists only with reference to itself. It is self-referential, self-positing. By its very nature, Euro-Optimism is central to itself. And it moves through like this… it does not refer to outside others. It does not draw energy from the other. It is its own “thing.” It is never “about” anything but the “properly” positive identification and centrality of whiteness. For this reason, moving forward there shall be more to say.